Optional Final Oral Exam

Students in this course may choose to complete a final, cumulative oral exam in place of all other graded coursework (exams, assignments, quizzes). This option is designed to assess understanding of course concepts through explanation and reasoning rather than written work. To be absolutely clear, the oral exam is intended to be equivalent to standard assessment, not an easier version of it.

Choosing the oral exam is optional, but it must be decided prior to sitting for the first exam and it cannot be changed once the first exam has passed.

Students who prefer traditional grading may continue with the standard course assessments. This being said, I highly encourage all students, regardless of your decision, to continue to study and prepare for the standard assessments as normal.


What Is the Oral Exam?

The oral exam is a structured, individual assessment focused on your understanding of the core ideas of the course. It is not a debate, performance, or test of confidence.

  • Format: One-on-one exam with the instructor
  • Length: Approximately 20–30 minutes
  • Timing: During the final exam period or the week prior

You may ask for clarification, pause to think, or revise an answer during the exam.


Scope of the Exam

The exam covers the central learning objectives of the course, not every example or technical detail.

You may be asked to:

  • Explain key concepts in your own words
  • Compare or connect ideas from different parts of the course
  • Reason through unfamiliar but course-appropriate situations
  • Identify or correct common misconceptions
  • Explain why a method or interpretation is appropriate

The exam will not require:

  • Lengthy calculations
  • Memorization without context
  • Trivia-level recall
  • Speeded responses

How Your Performance Is Assessed

Your exam is evaluated using a standardized rubric. Grades are based on the substance of your responses, not confidence, presentation style, or speed of speech.

Evaluation criteria include:

  1. Conceptual Understanding
    Accuracy and depth of understanding of core concepts.

  2. Reasoning & Connections
    Ability to explain why ideas work and relate concepts to one another.

  3. Communication & Precision
    Clarity of explanation and appropriate use of course terminology.

  4. Responsiveness to Feedback
    Ability to refine or improve responses when prompted.

Follow-up questions are used to clarify reasoning and allow improvement; a partially correct answer can often be strengthened through explanation.

Possible grades include A, B, C, or F. I’m inclined to avoid +/- grading, but reserve the right to modify the letter grade based on either oral exam performance or your cumulative performance on the standard assessments (e.g., a B on the oral exam, accompanied by excellent attendance, participation, and performance on written exam can be grounds for a B+)

An example rubric is given at the end of this document.


Fairness and Documentation

To ensure consistency and fairness:

  • The same rubric is used for all oral exams
  • The instructor takes structured notes aligned to the rubric
  • Grades are based on documented evidence, not general impressions

Oral exams may be audio recorded for grading verification purposes and are used only in the event of a grade question.


Grade Review Process

If you believe your oral exam was graded incorrectly, you may request a review. Reviews are based on:

  1. The rubric criteria
  2. The instructor’s notes (and recording, if applicable)
  3. Specific rubric areas where you believe the evaluation was incorrect

Grade changes are made based on rubric evidence, not overall impressions or comparisons to other students.


Choosing This Option

The oral exam is a high-responsibility option that works best for students who are comfortable explaining ideas aloud and engaging in conceptual discussion.

If you are unsure which assessment format is right for you, please speak with the instructor before deciding.


Oral Exam Example Rubric

Your oral exam will be evaluated using something like the criteria below. Performance is assessed based on the substance of your responses rather than confidence, speaking style, or speed. Each of these criteria may be evaluated holistically or associated with individual topics (e.g., testing conceptual understanding on t-tests, distinct from conceptual understanding on ANOVA).

1. Conceptual Understanding

  • Strong
    Demonstrates accurate and flexible understanding of core concepts; explanations reflect clear comprehension.

  • Adequate
    Demonstrates basic understanding with minor imprecision or small gaps.

  • Needs Improvement
    Shows significant misunderstandings or relies on memorized language without understanding.

2. Reasoning and Connections

  • Strong
    Clearly explains why ideas work, connects concepts across the course, and applies ideas to new situations.

  • Adequate
    Follows standard reasoning but struggles to generalize or make connections.

  • Needs Improvement
    Reasoning is incomplete, unsupported, or inconsistent.

3. Communication and Precision

  • Strong
    Communicates ideas clearly and uses course terminology accurately.

  • Adequate
    Ideas are understandable but occasionally vague or imprecise.

  • Needs Improvement
    Explanations are difficult to follow or consistently imprecise.

4. Responsiveness to Feedback

  • Strong
    Effectively refines or corrects responses in response to follow-up questions.

  • Adequate
    Makes limited improvements when prompted.

  • Needs Improvement
    Does not meaningfully engage with clarification or correction.